Four Years Later, Again
In the spring of any presidential election year, questions roll in about party, policy, the growing political divide, and what that means for capital markets. What would various political scenarios mean for stocks? What happens if a particular tax policy proposal becomes law? Although situation and scenario-specific, in most cases, we do not urge action related to investments and asset allocation, but often will suggest action related to tax and financial planning.
Political Party Impact on Stocks
History shows us that there is no right answer to what mixture of Democrats or Republicans in the White House or Congress will yield better investment returns. Even if we have seen enough cases when a split Congress and White House reflected something statisticians would call significant, performance differences have been marginal at best. Blue and red waves are rare, and therefore not statistically backed, but it may surprise you that in the times we had such waves, performance of U.S. equities was stronger than during divided governments.
The takeaway from these exercises is always the same – staying invested outpaces party timing. The U.S. has operated under a divided government almost 70% of the time going back 125 years (Republicans had full control 13% of the time while Democrats the other 17%), and during those windows, stocks rose seven out of every ten years. Therefore, waiting for one’s party to gain control can be financially punitive.
Tax Policy Market Reaction
In the 22 instances (going back to 1950) where markets faced an increase in taxes (either income, corporate, or capital gains), only two years were flat to negative (1969 and 1970). As tax hikes are not always punitive, tax cuts are not always cheered. Markets rallied with the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act 2017 (TCJA); however, when capital gains taxes were cut in 1981, the S&P fell more than 20% over the year. Markets do not always follow a preset formula when it comes to taxes. Even when we see corporate tax cuts, which filter down to company bottom lines and therefore improve company fundamentals and theoretically stock price, markets are more subject to the state of the economy (GDP growth, inflation dynamics, employment, interest rates, etc.) and its ramifications for future earnings growth.
Why go back to only 1950 and not 1900 like we have for political parties? That’s in part because consistent income taxes did not come around until the passage of the 16th amendment in 1913. That year also brought capital gains taxes, though they did not top 10% until the start of the roaring 1920s. Dividends went through a complicated history of taxation between 1909 and 1954 (largely not taxed for most of that period). Thereafter and until 2003, when they found a lower rate, they were taxed as ordinary income rates. Lastly, corporations did not pay federal tax until 1909, and it was not until 1918 that they paid more than 10%.
What is Actionable - Personal Tax Planning For 2025
Now for the action. We do not know what the probability of a tax-regime change is in the current environment, and we may not know for many months after the election. A party split generally translates to little tax change, and from the perspective of long-term planning, is a bit easier to navigate than a color wave. That does not mean that one should stay idle. The baseline assumption is that unless we see proactive congressional/executive support, the TCJA of 2017 will say goodbye at the end of 2025. Changes will follow, and many of them will have a cost (but not all). As a refresher, let’s break down some of the most impactful provisions for individual taxpayers:
- Individual Income Tax Rates – The TCJA gave most of us a little break, but when it expires, tax rates are going up to their previous levels. The current brackets of 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35%, and 37% will increase to 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, 35%, and 39.6%. Additionally, the income levels for the brackets will decrease slightly, which generally increases taxes.
- Standard Deduction – If you’ve been taking advantage of the $29,200 standard deduction (for married folks filing jointly), enjoy it for just a little while longer. After 2025, it’ll shrink back to about half of that.
- Personal Exemptions – Remember the personal exemption? It’s been suspended since the TCJA took over, but it’s coming back to give your tax return a little bit of a boost. Although, with an AGI phaseout that will reduce/eliminate this benefit, it will be a non-factor for many taxpayers.
- State and Local Tax (SALT) Deduction – If you live in a high-tax state, the SALT cap has been costly. Currently, you can only deduct $10,000 of state and local taxes (income and real estate for example) regardless of how much you actually paid. After the TCJA sunsets, the cap is going away.
- Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) – The AMT thresholds were raised in the TCJA, so fewer people were subject to it. After 2025, the AMT will come back for more taxpayers.
- Mortgage Interest Deduction – Currently, if your mortgage is under $750,000, you can deduct the interest. After 2025, the limit goes up to $1 million.
- Estate and Gift Taxes – The estate tax exemption is set at $13.61 million right now, but after 2025, it drops in half.
- Qualified Business Income Deduction (Section 199A) – Small businesses have been getting a 20% deduction on pass-through income, but after 2025, that’s going away.
- Pease Limitation – The Pease limitation, which reduces the value of itemized deductions for high earners, will come back after 2025.
- Marriage Penalty – The TCJA gave married couples some relief, but after 2025, the “marriage penalty” returns. As a reminder, the marriage penalty is when a household’s overall tax bill increases due to a couple marrying and filing taxes jointly.
The above sunsets translate into planning conversations ranging from state-tax dynamics, estate planning, charitable gift timing, asset location, IRA conversions, and many more. We encourage clients to work with their advisors well ahead of the impending sunsets.
Per broader market impacts, we point to the start of this piece. We also note that not all cuts are sunsetting. The lower corporate tax rates (reminder that they went from 35% to 21%) would have to be proactively changed. One last point on a question we get surrounding potential taxes of unrealized cap gains. First, from everything we see, hear, and read, this looks like a very low probability scenario. Second, it may surprise many that only 25% of U.S. stocks are owned in taxable U.S. accounts. The rest are owned by various flavors of foreign investors (roughly 40%), retirement/defined benefit plans (roughly 30%), insurance products, non-profits, and the like. That does not mean a change like that would not be material, but it may not be to the degree that many fear.